LotR TCG Wiki
→ Card Sets: All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
→ Forums: TLHH CC PC

Author Topic: The Immaculate Inaugaration  (Read 201 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

January 15, 2009, 12:17:03 pm
Read 201 times

Gate Troll

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 971
The Immaculate Inaugaration
« on: January 15, 2009, 12:17:03 pm »
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: UK Daily Mail online:  "Bush Declares a 'State of Emergency' in Washington as Cost of Obama's Swearing-in Ceremony Soars to £110m."  This is over $150 million.  Now, I was a little early when I was on the way to the White House yesterday, so I had the driver take me by the Capitol, the side that's set up for the inauguration.  I have never seen in my life so many Port-A-Potties all over everywhere.  They're surrounding the Washington Monument; they're all the way down The Mall; they are on the grounds of Capitol Hill; the seats where the two-hundred and some odd thousand who are given official tickets will sit to witness the swearing-in ceremony.  It's just massive.  It is just huge, and I'm thinking all the stories we've had downplaying expectations of the number of people showing up. 

Here is the story from the UK Daily Mail: "Barack Obama's inauguration is set to cost more than £100m making it the most expensive swearing-in ceremony in US history.  The President-elect will take less than a minute to recite the oath of office in front of an estimated two million people--" oh, it's down to two million now "-- in the US capital next week. But by the time the final dance has been held at one of the many inaugural balls the costs for the day will be a staggering £110m," or over $150 million.  Do you know where this number was revealed?  It was revealed yesterday as Obama scrambled to answer questions about the nomination of Timothy Geithner.  "Obama's White House spokesman, Robert Gibbs, said in a statement that Geithner had committed honest mistakes that he quickly addressed upon learning," and then they went on to discuss this.  Okay, so, $150 million, Obama inauguration.  Got that? 

Let's go back to the Associated Press in 2005, the reporter Will Lester.  This is a January 13th AP dispatch:  "President Bush's second inauguration will cost tens of millions of dollars -- $40 million alone in private donations for the balls, parade and other invitation-only parties. With that kind of money, what could you buy?  Two hundred armored Humvees with the best armor for troops in Iraq; vaccinations and preventive health care for 22 million children in regions devastated by the tsunami; a down payment on the nation's deficit, which hit a record-breaking $412 billion last year."  Speaking of that, without the stimulus, we got the first three months of the 2009 fiscal year budget.  We're on track to a $1.2 trillion deficit, and here in 2005, we're spending way too much money on Bush's inauguration, why, we could make a down payment on the nation's deficit. 

And finally, "All these questions, what could we better spend the Bush inauguration money on, have come from Bush supporters and opponents.  Do we need to spend this money on what seems so extravagant?"  That was the lead, Will Lester, AP, January 13th.  Yesterday, January 13th, 2009, Laurie Kellman: "So you're attending an inaugural ball saluting the historic election of Barack Obama in the worst economic climate in three generations. Can you get away with glitzing it up and still be appropriate, not to mention comfortable and financially viable?  To quote the man of the hour: Yes, you can. Veteran ballgoers say you should. And fashionistas insist that you must.  'This is a time to celebrate. This is a great moment. Do not dress down. Do not wear the Washington uniform,' said Tim Gunn, a native Washingtonian and Chief Creative Officer at Liz Claiborne, Inc. 'Just because the economy is in a downturn, it doesn't mean that style is going to be in a downturn,' agreed Ken Downing, fashion director for Neiman Marcus."
Not one story so far about how many people in Darfur could we feed with this $150 million?  How many Africans could be vaccinated against AIDS for some of this $150 million?  What size home could you buy the brother George Obama, still living in the hut with just a meager portion of this $150 million?  Aunt Zeituni might even be able to buy her a green card with a portion of the $150 million.  What about all the children without health care?  What about all of the middle-class people without jobs?  How many people could be aided with a portion of Obama's inauguration budget?  Bush, it was $40 million and they were asking how it could be better spent, that it's unnecessary.  We weren't in a recession either, by the way, we weren't in an economic downturn.  Now in the midst of an economic downturn, oh, yeah, go out there and gussie it up all you can, dress it up, spend it up, bad economic times, this is when we need to indulge ourselves more.  Change we can believe in...

January 15, 2009, 12:34:45 pm
Reply #1

FM

  • Future Judge
  • *******
  • Information Offline
  • Wizard
  • Posts: 4074
Re: The Immaculate Inaugaration
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2009, 12:34:45 pm »
That's... unnecessary. The things that could be done with that kind of money being well spent... BOTH of them, I mean, not just Obama. Is it customary to make it such a gala event as to spend half the anual resources or a mediu-sized city?

January 15, 2009, 12:48:00 pm
Reply #2

Anonymous Prodigy

  • *******
  • Information Offline
  • Wizard
  • Posts: 4318
  • Former Moderator
Re: The Immaculate Inaugaration
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2009, 12:48:00 pm »
Behold, the logics of the Left of America.

January 15, 2009, 01:14:33 pm
Reply #3

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: The Immaculate Inaugaration
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2009, 01:14:33 pm »
It's interesting where Obama's priorities are.

January 15, 2009, 01:19:34 pm
Reply #4

Gil-Estel

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2267
  • Abuser of the Force
Re: The Immaculate Inaugaration
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2009, 01:19:34 pm »
Who, in their right mind could ever justify this amount of money? Seriously, this isn't a matter of right or left, this is a matter of common sense. It would have been an enormous gesture to make an historic moment even a greater one when Obama insisted on making this event a small one....But such things only happen in fairytails I guess.... :-k
..."Elves seldom give unguarded advice, for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill"...

January 15, 2009, 01:45:41 pm
Reply #5

sickofpalantirs

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Useful Spammer
  • Posts: 8880
  • one spammer to rule them all
Re: The Immaculate Inaugaration
« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2009, 01:45:41 pm »
got something aside from rush to verify those numbers?
Felipe Musco:
(after all, it's a CHARITY organization, I still have SOME principles, even having gone through Law School... :P),
Elf Lvr:
Bit of a scrawny Iowan kid with an unhealthy artifact obsession. Oh, and a God of Spam. In a good way.
Ahhh!!! SoP, you're a genius!!! :gp: ~Menace64
SoP's Trade List
Like Muscle Cars? Check out themusclecarplace.com

January 15, 2009, 03:37:53 pm
Reply #6

HawkeyeSPF

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 639
Re: The Immaculate Inaugaration
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2009, 03:37:53 pm »
Have any of you thought of how much of that money is necessary to PROTECT the man from ignorant racists who would like nothing better then to have a shot at him? Have any of you thought of how much of that money is necessary simply due to the sheer number of people who want to be present at this historic event? You can't simply have 2 million people show up in your city without preparations to accomodate their needs, like available bathroom facilities. I'm sure a large chunk of that money is dedicated to things that not Obama, his incoming administration, or his campaign can control or even begin to predict.

You call him out for spending this much money on his inauguration, but have you thought about WHY it's going to cost that much?

January 15, 2009, 03:50:40 pm
Reply #7

Anonymous Prodigy

  • *******
  • Information Offline
  • Wizard
  • Posts: 4318
  • Former Moderator
Re: The Immaculate Inaugaration
« Reply #7 on: January 15, 2009, 03:50:40 pm »
Before I respond, what are the new rules on swearing and then banning as a result?

January 15, 2009, 05:27:38 pm
Reply #8

sickofpalantirs

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Useful Spammer
  • Posts: 8880
  • one spammer to rule them all
Re: The Immaculate Inaugaration
« Reply #8 on: January 15, 2009, 05:27:38 pm »
lol, don't call someone a B**** or M*****F***** and you should be good ;)


BTW nice to see you back hawkeye.
Felipe Musco:
(after all, it's a CHARITY organization, I still have SOME principles, even having gone through Law School... :P),
Elf Lvr:
Bit of a scrawny Iowan kid with an unhealthy artifact obsession. Oh, and a God of Spam. In a good way.
Ahhh!!! SoP, you're a genius!!! :gp: ~Menace64
SoP's Trade List
Like Muscle Cars? Check out themusclecarplace.com

January 15, 2009, 05:37:28 pm
Reply #9

Gate Troll

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 971
Re: The Immaculate Inaugaration
« Reply #9 on: January 15, 2009, 05:37:28 pm »
Have any of you thought of how much of that money is necessary to PROTECT the man from ignorant racists who would like nothing better then to have a shot at him? Have any of you thought of how much of that money is necessary simply due to the sheer number of people who want to be present at this historic event? You can't simply have 2 million people show up in your city without preparations to accomodate their needs, like available bathroom facilities. I'm sure a large chunk of that money is dedicated to things that not Obama, his incoming administration, or his campaign can control or even begin to predict.

You call him out for spending this much money on his inauguration, but have you thought about WHY it's going to cost that much?

Hey, I'm not calling him out, I'm just saying that its interesting how when Obama does something its fine, and when Bush did the same thing he got lambasted for it. Take it how you will...  ;)

January 15, 2009, 05:45:17 pm
Reply #10

FM

  • Future Judge
  • *******
  • Information Offline
  • Wizard
  • Posts: 4074
Re: The Immaculate Inaugaration
« Reply #10 on: January 15, 2009, 05:45:17 pm »
Well, I'd lambast both of them anyway. :P

January 15, 2009, 05:56:19 pm
Reply #11

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: The Immaculate Inaugaration
« Reply #11 on: January 15, 2009, 05:56:19 pm »
And already you've got more courage than 90% of mainstream media.

January 15, 2009, 11:33:40 pm
Reply #12

Gil-Estel

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2267
  • Abuser of the Force
Re: The Immaculate Inaugaration
« Reply #12 on: January 15, 2009, 11:33:40 pm »
I'm aware of the risks that there are. I know a lot of people want to be there when it happens, but in certain circumstances you need to take desperate measures. US dept is higher then ever, a lot of people are facing unemployment, the whole world is in a financial crisis...
It would be awesome to sense some perspective, especially by those who are supposed to drag us through this situation. Make it a life-broadcast from the oval-office or something like that, or go to a military base where security is already at a maximum level...Be creative.
..."Elves seldom give unguarded advice, for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill"...

January 16, 2009, 12:07:33 am
Reply #13

Olorin

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 510
  • You shall not pass!
Re: The Immaculate Inaugaration
« Reply #13 on: January 16, 2009, 12:07:33 am »
Who, in their right mind could ever justify this amount of money? Seriously, this isn't a matter of right or left, this is a matter of common sense. It would have been an enormous gesture to make an historic moment even a greater one when Obama insisted on making this event a small one....But such things only happen in fairytails I guess.... :-k

I absolutely share your opinion!
Mithrandir I am known to the Elves, Tharkun to the dwarves; Olorin was the name in my youth in the West which is forgotten, in the South Incanus, in the North Gandalf; into the East I will not go."

January 16, 2009, 07:48:52 am
Reply #14

FingolfinFinwe

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 507
Re: The Immaculate Inaugaration
« Reply #14 on: January 16, 2009, 07:48:52 am »
Have any of you thought of how much of that money is necessary to PROTECT the man from ignorant racists who would like nothing better then to have a shot at him? Have any of you thought of how much of that money is necessary simply due to the sheer number of people who want to be present at this historic event? You can't simply have 2 million people show up in your city without preparations to accomodate their needs, like available bathroom facilities. I'm sure a large chunk of that money is dedicated to things that not Obama, his incoming administration, or his campaign can control or even begin to predict.

You call him out for spending this much money on his inauguration, but have you thought about WHY it's going to cost that much?

As GT already stated the point was to compare the perception of Bush's 40mil (during war) vs Obama's 150mil (during a recession).

On your point about the reasons it costs so much.. Port-a-pots and security only cost so much.  It isn't anywhere near the majority of the tens/hundreds of mil.

I agree with most here that both numbers are ridiculous.