LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC

Author Topic: Unofficial Rulebook Discussion #9 (Aug 20 - Aug 23) -- Held  (Read 182 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

August 19, 2010, 06:25:15 pm
Read 182 times

Tbiesty

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 561
Unofficial Rulebook Discussion #9 (Aug 20 - Aug 23) -- Held
« on: August 19, 2010, 06:25:15 pm »
This discussion and ruling is part of the series of discussions and rulings for an "Unofficial Rulebook" as described here.

This discussion will be open from Aug 20, 2010 - Aug 23, 2010.
The outcome of this discussion and ruling will be added to the "Unofficial Rulebook".

Discussion #9:

How should Held work with Frodo, Frenzied Fighter?    (previous discussion, previous discussion)

Option 1:
It can be played on Frodo, Frenzied Fighter.  Therefore, whenever Frodo, Frenzied Fighter is about to be killed by a wound, add a burden instead. When the fellowship moves to any site 9, nothing happens since only the Ring-bearer can be corrupted.

Option 2:
It can only be played on a "Ring-bearer" Frodo, since the intent of Held is to avoid having Frodo wear The One Ring, and possibly corrupt him if still bearing Held at any site 9.

August 19, 2010, 06:45:56 pm
Reply #1

Elessar's Socks

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1353
  • "I see...I look foul and feel foul. Is that it?"
Re: Unofficial Rulebook Discussion #9 (Aug 20 - Aug 23) -- Held
« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2010, 06:45:56 pm »
Option 1, though I think it's covered already by "Only your Ring-bearer can be corrupted."

August 19, 2010, 06:54:55 pm
Reply #2

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Unofficial Rulebook Discussion #9 (Aug 20 - Aug 23) -- Held
« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2010, 06:54:55 pm »
Option 1, but no clarification is necessary, as the current rules are clear enough.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2010, 07:10:34 pm by MR. Lurtzy »

August 20, 2010, 12:38:49 am
Reply #3

Witchkingx5

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1159
Re: Unofficial Rulebook Discussion #9 (Aug 20 - Aug 23) -- Held
« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2010, 12:38:49 am »
Option 1, seems pretty obvious to me:

"All cards do what they say."

August 20, 2010, 03:10:42 am
Reply #4

Thranduil

  • *******
  • Information Offline
  • Wizard
  • Posts: 4996
    • Zalman's Dungeon (blog of SF stories by Thranduil)
Re: Unofficial Rulebook Discussion #9 (Aug 20 - Aug 23) -- Held
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2010, 03:10:42 am »
Actually this card does do something in my DC sets as the term "corrupted" can apply to any companion with resistance 0. But anyway...

The technical answer here is option 1.

Thranduil

August 20, 2010, 11:46:22 am
Reply #5

mardukra

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Uruk-hai
  • Posts: 74

August 23, 2010, 05:35:13 pm
Reply #6

Tbiesty

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 561
Re: Unofficial Rulebook Discussion #9 (Aug 20 - Aug 23) -- Held
« Reply #6 on: August 23, 2010, 05:35:13 pm »
Option 1 it is.  The "Unofficial Rulebook" has been updated.