If you'll pardon me saying it, that's a rather bland take on life.
I don't find it bland myself, but I don't mind you calling it so.
Doesn't that kind of make this whole argument a moot point under such a view? I mean, I could murder someone and excuse it by saying in my little reality murder is justified?
Reality is perceived differently by each and every being. A shark routinely detects magnetic waves in the water which, for you or I, would simply not register as part of our reality. To follow on from your example,
in whose eyes would you be excused for the murder you yourself feel justified in committing?
However, my agnostic view of the nature of good and evil does not render moot
any argument
per se.
Just, ah, throwing that out there for consideration. After all, the Empire can't be 'evil' or even 'good' if there is no good or evil, it would just exist.
Thanks. I disagree that the Empire can't be perceived as "good" or "evil" without Good or Evil existing outside of human perception. And I agree that it existed (in
Star Wars); it certainly existed for the Alliance as they perceived it to be too "evil" a regime to exist...
I guess what I'm saying is that, like beauty, it's all in the eye of the beholder.